Trade Compliance
Automating FTA eligibility checks at order entry
Importers routinely pay full duty on goods that already qualify for a free trade agreement rate. Not because the agreements are unavailable — because nobody checked in time, on that SKU, against that agreement's specific rule of origin.
Claiming a preference is opt-in. If no determination is made and no claim is filed, the entry quietly defaults to the full MFN rate. Nothing flags it, the goods clear, and the overpayment is invisible until someone audits it.
Why eligible goods still get charged full duty
Per-SKU checking doesn't scale
Eligibility is decided per HS code, per origin, per agreement. A 2,000-SKU catalogue is 2,000 separate determinations — so teams check the top sellers and default the rest to full MFN.
Rules of origin are product-specific
Qualifying is not simply 'made in a partner country'. Each HS heading has its own rule — a tariff shift, a regional value content threshold, or (for textiles) yarn-forward. The rule differs even between neighbouring HS lines.
The decision happens too late
By the time a broker files the entry, the purchase order is placed and the supplier chosen. Eligibility only changes sourcing decisions if it is known at order entry, not at the border.
Documentation burden
Claiming preferential treatment requires a valid certification of origin and supporting records under CBP's Reasonable Care standard. Teams skip marginal claims rather than risk an unsupported one.
Agreements and rates change
Preference programs lapse, get renewed retroactively, and shift with trade policy. A determination made last year may be wrong today.
What changes when the check moves to order entry
The usual sequence is: place the order, ship the goods, classify at the border, pay the duty. Eligibility surfaces last — when the only remaining question is how much to pay.
Moving the determination to the point of order entry changes what it can influence. If two qualified suppliers differ by 6.5 percentage points of duty because one origin qualifies under an agreement and the other does not, that is a sourcing decision — but only while the order is still open. After the PO is placed it is just a cost you have already committed to.
The practical test for any eligibility process: does its output arrive early enough to change a decision, and is it specific enough to act on per SKU? A determination that arrives at the border is an accounting entry, not a decision.
Major US trade agreements and their origin rules
| Agreement | Coverage | Preferential rate | Rule of origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| USMCA | US ↔ Canada, Mexico | 0% on qualifying goods | Regional value content or tariff shift; certification by importer, exporter or producer |
| KORUS | US ↔ South Korea | 0% on most industrial goods | Tariff shift or RVC, product-specific |
| US–Australia FTA | US ↔ Australia | 0% on most goods | Wholly obtained or substantial transformation |
| CAFTA-DR | US ↔ Central America, Dominican Republic | 0% on qualifying goods | Yarn-forward for textiles |
| US–Chile / Peru / Colombia | US ↔ each partner | 0% on most goods | Tariff shift or RVC |
| GSP | US ↔ eligible developing economies | 0% on covered lines | 35% value-added in beneficiary country |
Coverage and rates summarised for orientation. Rules of origin are product-specific and change — verify the current rule for your HS heading, and confirm any claim with a licensed customs broker before filing.
An FTA does not zero your whole duty bill
A trade agreement reduces the MFN rate. It does not remove Section 301 tariffs on Chinese-origin goods, and it does not remove the forced-labor tariff — except for USMCA-qualifying goods from Canada and Mexico, which are exempt from the forced-labor tariff. Budgeting a qualifying shipment at 0% total duty is one of the more expensive assumptions in import planning.
What an automated assessment actually produces
- A per-SKU qualification status, not a country-level assumption
- The duty difference at stake, so SKUs can be prioritised by money rather than alphabetically
- The specific rule of origin applied, so the determination can be defended under Reasonable Care
- A re-check when rates, agreements or your bill of materials change
- A record of the decision — model version, inputs, reviewer — for audit purposes
Frequently asked questions
What does it mean to automate FTA eligibility checks at order entry?
It means determining — at the moment a purchase order is created, not when the goods reach customs — whether each product qualifies for a free trade agreement's preferential duty rate. The system takes the product's HS classification, country of origin and bill-of-materials data, applies the relevant agreement's rules of origin, and returns a qualify / does-not-qualify result with the duty difference. Checking at order entry matters because that is the last point where sourcing can still change.
How do you assess FTA qualification across thousands of SKUs?
Manually it is not feasible: each SKU needs its own determination against product-specific rules of origin. Automated assessment works by classifying every SKU to an 8–10 digit HS code, joining that to the applicable agreement's rule for that heading, and evaluating the rule against available origin and component data. The output is a per-SKU qualification status plus the duty saving at stake, so a team can prioritise the SKUs where the money actually is rather than checking alphabetically.
Why do importers overpay duty on goods that already qualify?
Because claiming a preference is opt-in. If no one determines eligibility and files the claim with valid origin certification, the entry defaults to the full MFN rate — and nothing flags it. The duty is paid, the entry clears, and the overpayment is invisible unless someone audits it. The most common causes are per-SKU checking not scaling, product-specific rules of origin being misread, and the determination happening after the sourcing decision is already locked.
Can you recover duty already overpaid on FTA-eligible goods?
Sometimes. Under US rules a post-importation preference claim can generally be made within one year of importation for certain agreements (via CBP Form 520(d) or a post-summary correction, depending on timing and agreement). Beyond that window, protest and reconciliation options are narrower. This is worth reviewing with a licensed customs broker — the recoverable amount on a mid-size catalogue is frequently material.
Does FTA eligibility remove Section 301 or the forced-labor tariff?
No. A free trade agreement reduces the MFN duty rate. It does not remove Section 301 tariffs on Chinese-origin goods, and it does not remove the forced-labor Section 301 tariff (10–12.5%) that replaced the Section 122 surcharge in July 2026 — with the exception of USMCA-qualifying goods from Canada and Mexico, which are exempt. So a Korean, Colombian or Moroccan good that is duty-free under its FTA still pays 10–12.5%. This is a frequent and expensive misunderstanding: importers assume an FTA zeroes the whole duty bill when it only zeroes one component of it.
What documentation is required to claim preferential treatment?
A valid certification of origin — under USMCA this can be completed by the importer, exporter or producer and does not require a prescribed form, but must contain the required data elements. The importer must also retain supporting records (bills of materials, supplier declarations, production records) demonstrating the rule of origin was met, and must exercise Reasonable Care in making the claim. An unsupported claim is a compliance exposure, not just a rejected refund.
See your true landed cost per SKU
Duty, Section 301, the forced-labor tariff, VAT and freight — calculated per product, updated for 2026 rules. Free, no account required.
Run a free cost analysis